AndAudio.com

由 **husky03623** 發表於週六 4月 14, 2007 9:35 pm

姊夫 ....

這一兩天AA連線速度有點詭異，有時收詢文章還會斷線
簡單說就是連線速度一下正常但一會兒會慢的很異常。

小弟測試過自己網路速度大約都在6~12M之間跑
也連其他的網站來觀察網路連線速度，一切都正常。
唯獨連AA會有這現象。

是我自己本身網路問題嗎?

由 **eavan_cloud** 發表於週六 4月 14, 2007 10:17 pm

+1 我也以為是我家的ISP商問題 , 差點打電話過去"詢問"了 :eeh:

由 **protoss0809** 發表於週日 4月 15, 2007 2:07 am

我發現PING的回應時間都很長耶
我用SEEDNET跟學術網路PING都是一樣的結果

SEEDNET：
Pinging www.andaudio.com [210.241.227.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=933ms TTL=110
Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=1363ms TTL=110
Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=1108ms TTL=110
Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=635ms TTL=110

Ping statistics for 210.241.227.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 635ms, Maximum = 1363ms, Average = 1009ms

學術網路：
[root@NTOP ~]# ping www.andaudio.com
PING www.andaudio.com (210.241.227.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 210.241.227.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=1349 ms
64 bytes from 210.241.227.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=115 time=1342 ms
64 bytes from 210.241.227.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=115 time=952 ms
64 bytes from 210.241.227.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=115 time=979 ms
64 bytes from 210.241.227.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=115 time=820 ms

--- www.andaudio.com ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 5008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 820.256/1088.787/1349.100/216.773 ms, pipe 2

應該不是被人DDOS了吧?

由 **ahniou** 發表於週日 4月 15, 2007 10:33 am

連線速度偏慢+1...
不過今天早上似乎有好一些 :bs:

由阿榮發表於週日 4月 15, 2007 12:51 pm

剛剛PING的結果..

C:\>ping www.andaudio.com

Pinging www.andaudio.com [210.241.227.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=117
Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=117
Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=117
Reply from 210.241.227.10: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=117

Ping statistics for 210.241.227.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 64ms

應該已經好了吧?